This is a copy of a post I wrote to an online mailing list earlier today. I decided to share it with you, my readers.
Recently, a museum interpreter told me that more than ever the children visiting
on school trips ask if she knows about the secret quilt code. A few of them have
referred to a recent “video” they saw in school. Reportedly, the film links
Harriet Tubman with quilts (in some fashion).
Whoever is continuing to support the half-baked and fictional idea of quilts
being used as message devices on the Underground Railroad must have some greater
agenda to advance. “Why?” remains the question.
Enough of us who care about history and quilt history, in particular, have come
forward in a very straightforward and vocal way to dispute the “code” and to
give many, many reasons why it is not a viable concept.
Yet, we hear of museums going through their collections to “find” examples of
Underground Railroad Quilts that are just lurking and waiting to be
rediscovered. The would-be historians have a lot to learn. Part of that learning
includes the fact that no one can look at a quilt of any kind and surmise the
quilter’s intention. When that person is dead, we can never know that
information. Unless there is written provenance or facts that can be verified,
reading in a new meaning where none existed before is dangerous business.
Trouble is, people hears bits and pieces of hearsay and sincerely WANT to
believe the “new” history information. Apparently, it suits their sensibilities
to think that slaves were empowered by quilts.
To add to the problem is the fact that we all tend to believe what we see in
print and that is the danger of felonious newspaper articles written by
non-specialists.
The sad part is that this problem does not seem to be going away. Worst of all,
the tall tale has been inflicted upon our gullible young people, encouraged by a
school system that wants to “cover” Black history, but in a sanitized and
acceptable way, without the mention of whippings, greed, blood and pain.
I’ve said way too much on this topic already. It grieves my heart that my words
fall on deaf ears and have not filtered out to the general public who needs to
hear them. Yes, there is now a consensus among quilt historians and some
historians that the secret quilt code is not creditable history.
The trouble is that most people don’t bother analyzing a topic from a historical
perspective. Yet, they “think” they know everything about it.
The myth in question has morphed into a new problem. In light of the lack of
information about REAL Civil War quilts, the general public is making a lot of
quilts from quilt patterns sold as “Civil War” quilts that are supposedly
reproductions. In one instance, I asked a seller of a “reproduction” Civil War
quilt to tell me which quilt it was based upon. The word “reproduction” suggests
that the quilt is similar to an actual artifact. I was told that the quilt in
question was called a “reproduction” because it uses “reproduction” fabrics; and
that I am too “picky.” Go figure. To some… any way to make money is okay and
historical accuracy is not the goal.
My best,
Patricia Cummings
Quilter’s Muse Publications

