5mg cialis generic

5mg cialis generic

Friday, April 11th, 2008

If you visit an art museum, you will achieve a sense of the kind of art work that was worthy to be saved. If you visit a museum with a quilt collection, you will see quilts that were chosen to be retained in a permanent collection.

Quilting has always been a “copy art.” For that reason, we have a zillion “Log Cabin” quilts. Many other standard, published, quilt block names include a string of additional, acquired names, from print publications.

In the 1990s, decided “camps” of quilters were established: those whose quilts were exact replicas of those published in books and patterns; and those who copied the great masters, in the world of fine art. Yet other quilters who attempt to utilize only their original designs. Occasionally, drawing the line between who is an art quilter and who is a traditional quilter is difficult. Some quilters are versatile and engage in both types of quilting.

For the masses, who are not designers, and do not want to learn the skills to be one, “copying” means that they can create attractive quilts whose designs have been generated by a professional. Without worrying about color or fabric choices, a quilter is able to concentrate on achieving proficiency in craftsmanship. In Japan, students of needlework and quilting follow a “master,” as anyone could tell you who has ever attended classes in Japanese embroidery at Calloway Gardens in Georgia.

We all want to make pleasing quilts so, again and again, like water running downstream, we turn to quilters and artists of the past for inspiration. One of the most compelling quilts I have seen, in recent years, was a blue and white, award winning quilt made by Linda Franz, when it was on display at the Vermont Quilt Festival. Is the design totally original? No! It is based on a quilt made by England’s famous novelist and quilter, Jane Austen.

Likewise, the Civil War quilt made by Jane Stickle in Vermont, has achieved fame as a result of the work of a professional in the quilt world: Brenda Papadakis, with her 5mg cialis generic book. We have seen and been amazed by the original quilt that is held in the Bennington Museum in VT. Hundreds of quilters have rushed to replicate the tiny blocks.

Is there a stigma to revisiting and making patterns that have historical meaning, for one reason or another? I think not. There is not more value in being an “art quilter,” than in choosing to be a “traditional quilter.” The future is now and relies on innovation, but our roots are in the past. I believe we can successfully honor all quilts, and choose for ourselves the types of quilts we wish to make and the methods we like the best.

Patricia Cummings,

5mg cialis generic

Friday, July 13th, 2007

Quilting, over time, has experienced ebbs and wanes. The boom periods that most quilt historians acknowledge are the 1880s (after the economic downturn of the 1870s), the 1930s (during the Great Depression), and the 1970s onward, to the present. Some of us have wondered when the bubble would burst again and quilting would either disappear for awhile or undergo a major transformation.

The signs are there for all of the needle arts. Major organized groups are experiencing a smaller number of membership renewals. Antique quilts are no longer commanding “top dollar” – just because they are “old.” Crocheting seems to be experiencing a lull. Tatting is virtually invisible. Needlepunch has enjoyed a brief revival, but that does not seem to be going strong. Most online lists for quilting, its history, and needlework, in general, appear to have few posts.

Part of the problem with the Quilt Industry is what I call the Bandwagon Effect. If someone is selling a product and appears to be making money doing so, then everyone else wants a part of the action. Anything that looks “hot” is jumped on and very shortly, whatever it is that is being sold is ubiquitous (appears everywhere.) Magazine titles are constantly coming and going, literally. Book publishers for needlework and quilt titles, especially quilt history and textile history, are fewer in number and “less willing to take a chance” on new titles, in an already glutted market. Magazines are becoming thinner and thinner and more loaded with advertisements, as those with something to sell compete in the marketplace.

The trend seems to be going toward “quilt art,” a hard-to-define genre where anything “goes” and where the quality of work is not generally the main consideration; expressionism is.

As I’ve said many times before, there is room for all of us, and that includes “Daddy.” Remember the show, “Make Room for Daddy?” Well, in some cases, Daddy is a quilter. Quilting is an international affair, and a cross-gender one, too. We all have much to bring to the table.

I don’t foresee the total eradication of quilting activities any time soon, but I just can’t help but wonder if we won’t all smother under the glut of products generated for a craft/ or an art, depending on your viewpoint, that traditionally has been a very simple task involving cloth, designs, a needle, and thread.

There are traditionalists who enjoy revisiting the old techniques. Others want to create new trends. In trying to reinvent the wheel, some of us are losing our way and forgetting the very things that brought us to this point. I hope that we will all look closely at what we are doing, and assess why we are making the choices we do. For it is only in understanding our own motivations that we can truly represent ourselves in our quilts and needlework.

Patricia Cummings

5mg cialis generic

Monday, June 25th, 2007

The phenomena has always been with us. We have the artists, and we have the art critics. We have the quilters, and we have the art quilters (never the twain shall meet, according to some). Then, we have the quilt historians, who attempt to assess quilts and place them within a context. Many of those individuals are NOT quilters, or have made only a feeble stab at learning to quilt. In summary, there are those who do the actual work of creating something, (quilts), for others to either appreciate, or to denigrate, as suits them.

When is a quilt to be considered art? “Art is in the eye of the beholder,” or so it is said. However, “art” is also in the intention of the quilter.

Today, many people, especially baby-boomers who have wanted a change of direction in their lives, have left former occupations, for both medical and mental health reasons. They have sought creative outlets, and they have found that quilting is a good venue for self-expression. Quilting can garner a few sheckles, too, besides getting these folks noticed via various showings of their work in galleries, etc.

Today’s “so-called” art quilters approach quilting from varying viewpoints, and on a number of levels, but usually need a quick turn-around time for finishing a piece because they want to sell it. This sometimes results in poor workmanship. Mostly, it seems that people who tag themselves with the name of “art quilter” do not often take the time to solidly learn the basics of traditionally acceptable quilting practices. Their goal is mainly to express themselves.

One cannot generalize about a large group of people, with any certainty, but it does appear that they engage in quilting as a way to share their feelings about life’s challenges, disappointments, joys, discoveries, as well as their angst and anger at situations in which they have been victimized: incest, partner abuse, and more. No one shoe will fit all, and I am sure that no person, art quilter or not, would like to be summarily lumped into a category. Above all, they are individuals.

Each person has his/her own reason for making a quilt.

Personally, I am both an artist and a crafter. My early experiences were as an oil painter and needleworker. My formal art training is in art history, not studio art. My certification is as a “master craftsman in quilting.” That means that I learned how to do all types of quilting and embroidery and was able to prove my proficiency in quilting techniques by passing a series of tests. I am happy that I signed up for the national testing program, and I am happy that I now know how to do many needlework techniques, as a result of the motivation the program instilled in me, to learn on my own.

When I made a baby quilt recently, I considered myself a technician, a “crafter,” not because I used anyone else’s design but rather because of the simplicity of the design, (squares), and because I chose to quickly finish the quilt by machine quilting it.

On the other hand, when I design every facet of a quilt, from my own imagination, choosing the shapes, the colors, and the choice of materials, such as I did when I made a wall quilt titled, “On Windy Whispers,” then I consider myself to be quite “artistic,” and furthermore, I think of myself as an “artist.” At that point, it matters not what anyone else thinks of my completed work.

On Windy Whispers wall quilt made by Patricia Cummings, and inspired by a song

“On Windy Whispers” designed by Pat Cummings

I tend to think of ugly quilts as non-artistic. They show a lack of understanding of how color concepts work. When I see a quilt that is poorly pieced, or poorly quilted, I think – “What a shame that the quilter didn’t know better.” However, I have met quilters who have told me that they slap their quilts together and don’t give a care – the quilts are just made for warmth and that is that.

From what I have seen of antique quilts, I have to guess that an idea like that was more prevalent than we might realize because when we look at old quilts in books and magazines, we are viewing the pristine ones, still in fine condition. We are not seeing the ones with the mice holes, the stains, and the chewed up corners from when the dog was having a tizzy from being left alone.

This is a weighty subject, and also one that many people will continue to think about in light of the current Gee’s Bend quilt issues. Are those quilts truly art, or are they craft? I could go on and on because I am so heavily involved in quilting, as both a hobbyist and as a professional. However, your opinion is as good as mine. The important thing is that we all continue to think.
Pat